El Dorado Palm Springs, Ltd. v. Riverside County Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1265Opinion
GAUT, J.
1. Introduction
Revenue and Taxation Code section 51,1 enacted in 1978 as Proposition 8, allows the taxable value of real property to be reduced due to a decline in value.2
In 1997, plaintiff El Dorado Palm Springs, Ltd., a partnership (El Dorado), prevailed on an assessment appeal and obtained a reduction in a real property tax assessment for the tax year 1993.3 El Dorado failed to obtain a similar reduction for the five tax years 1994 through 1998. In 1999, El Dorado then filed suit seeking tax refunds for all five years. On appeal, El Dorado challenges the trial court’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. HicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Jenkins v. COUNTY OF LAS ANGELESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Metropolitan Culinary Services, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- El Dorado Palm Springs, Ltd. v. Riverside County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Luz Solar Partners Ltd. v. San Bernardino Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Luz Solar Partners Ltd. v. San Bernardino CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- RAR2 Villa Marina Center CA SPE, Inc. v. County of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2023