People v. Haydel
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J.
A jury found Lloyd and Dorothy Haydel guilty of grand theft. The court suspended imposition of the judgments and placed each defendant on probation conditioned on a jail term. They appeal, contending primarily that the court erred in admitting (a) four assertedly coerced written statements obtained from Haydel by the security officers of a store and (b) evidence procured by those officers at the Haydel home as a result of one of those statements. We have concluded that the court committed prejudicial error in admitting three of Haydel’s statements and the evidence obtained at…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. MahnkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- People v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.