Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Fenton

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 27, 1981No. 80-1608PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge.

■ After three days of deliberation, the jury found defendant Rooks Edward Crawford guilty of conspiring to violate the narcotics laws of New Jersey. The state trial judge, however, believing that the jury’s answers to special interrogatories were inconsistent with the guilty verdict, ordered the jury to continue its deliberations. After a day of further deliberation the jury, displaying confusion, asked to be released. The trial judge declared a mistrial over the defendants’ objections, holding that there was a manifest necessity to do so.

On federal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Pipefitters Local Union No. 562 v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Nathaniel Coleman, A/K/A "Boo Tee Coleman,"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. William Curtis, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. GalleganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. United States v. Felipe Rivera, United States of America v. Homer Willis Kelly, United States of America v. Ludvig DanielsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. State v. DunnsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API