Legal Opinion

United States v. Nathaniel Coleman, A/K/A "Boo Tee Coleman,"

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 5, 1989No. 87-1470PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Nathaniel Coleman (Coleman), appeals from a judgment of sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of violating 18 U.S.C.A. § 241 (West 1969) (Count I), 18 U.S.C.A. § 1503 (West 1984) and 18 U.S.C.A. § 2 (West 1969) (Count II). 1 Coleman contends that (1) the government violated the guarantees of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), by withholding certain evidence from the defendant and that we should either grant him a new trial or bar the prosecution under the double jeopardy clause of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Woodfox v. FotiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States of America, in 91-1201 v. Thomas L. McGill Jr., in 91-1122Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Jareem FahieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Leung Tak Lun, Chico Wong, and Andrew WongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Joseph RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API