Legal Opinion

KAZEMI

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1984No. ID 2961PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2961 MATTER OF KAZEMI In Exclusion Proceedings A-26183521 Decided by Board March 15, 1984 (1) An application for admission to the United States is a continuing application and an alien's admissibility is determined on the basis of the law and facts existing at the time the application is finally considered; therefore, the instant applicant is now inadmissible as a nonimmigrant student because he lacks a passport valid for at least the next 6 months, as required by

8 C.F.R. §214.2

(fX5X9 (1984). (2) The Board and immigration judges have jurisdiction to entertain an application…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Samuel Klapholz v. P. A. Esperdy, as District for the New York District of the Immigration Andnaturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. HEALY AND GOODCHILDBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1979
  3. KBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1961
  4. LE FLOCHBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1969
  5. MORGANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Catherine Torres v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Ramirez-Alejandre v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Ramon Ramirez-Alejandre v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. ALARCONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1992
  5. Victor Jimenez-Rodriguez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API