Legal Opinion
Peter A. Frasse & Co. v. Hartford Automotive Parts Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 23, 1924No. 1547PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
Exceptions have been filed by certain claimants to the report of the master appointed in this suit to hear and report on claims against the defendant.
Two claims are in question: One known as No. 10, filed in the name of James E. Davis, for the sum of $24,015.56, based on two promissory notes aggregating $25;000, on which the defendant was an indorser; and claim No. 17, filed in the name of Arthur E. Bowen, in the sum of $49,000, and based on certain 8 per cent, convertible gold notes issued by the defendant, and aggregating the face value of $49,000. These gold notes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Brown v. SpoffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Board of Com'rs v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Forsythe v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New Bern Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Metompkin Bank & Trust Co. v. BronsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939