Legal Opinion

Basiliko v. Royal National Bank of New York

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 6, 1971No. [No. 97, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case appellant, Nick Basiliko (Basiliko), complains because of entry of judgment against him in fa vor of appellee, Royal National Bank of New York (Bank), for $462,225.99 with interest at 6% from January 29, 1971, “on the outstanding balance.”

This judgment was actually made up of $388,093.63 debt, $13,842.01 interest and $60,290.35 attorney’s fees, the latter figure being 15% of combined debt and interest. The attorney’s fees did not appear as a separate item, but were included in the total. In thus entering the judgment the admonition of this Court in Webster v. Peoples Loan etc.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Webster v. People's Loan, Savings & Deposit BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  2. Platt v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. State Roads Commission v. SharperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. Riggs National Bank v. WelshCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Salem Construction Corp. v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lone v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. State Highway Administration v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Tretick v. LaymanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Wall v. HellerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Federal Armored Express, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API