Tretick v. Layman
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CATHELL, Judge.
Appellant, Bernard A. Tretick (Tretick), appeals the trial court’s granting of a defendant’s motion for judgment at the close of Tretick’s case. Tretick appeared pro se below and represents himself before us.
Tretick presents the following questions:(1) Did the trial court err in not awarding damages in the full amount of the suit due to gross violations of the direction of the Trial Date Notice on the part of Defendant?(2) Did the trial court and the Attorney for Defendant violate the common law rights of a Plaintiff Pro Se?(3) Did the trial court err in not issuing a bench…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Basoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Boone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Lane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Lohss and Sprenkle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Finucan v. Maryland State Board of Physician Quality AssuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Hopkins v. SilberCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Dean v. DIRECTOR OF FINANCE OF MONTGOMERY CTY.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Department of Labor, Licensing & Regulation v. WoodieCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Gantt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.