Legal Opinion

Adams v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 14, 2020No. 20-909Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-909C Filed: December 14, 2020 CHARLES J. ADAMS, et al., Keywords: Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(6); Plaintiffs, Motion for More Definite Statement; RCFC 12(e); 5 v. U.S.C. §§ 5545, 5343; hazardous duty pay; THE UNITED STATES, environmental differential pay; FLSA; 29 U.S.C. § 207; Defendant. COVID-19. David Ricksecker, McGillivary Steele Elkin LLP, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff. Eric E. Laufgraben, Senior Trial Counsel, and Liridona Sinani, Trial Counsel, with whom were Allison Kidd-Miller, Assistant Director, Robert E. Kirschmann, Jr.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sommers Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Adair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Whalen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API