Legal Opinion

Heck v. McConnell

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1987No. Docket No. 92568Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff filed a claim pursuant to the Paternity Act, MCL 722.711 et seq.; MSA 25.491 et seq., alleging that he is the father of defendant’s minor child born December 22, 1976. Plaintiff and defendant were never married. Plaintiff’s claim was dismissed pursuant to defendant’s motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7) on the basis that it was barred by the applicable period of limitations. Plaintiff appeals as of right raising several issues, one of which we find dispositive: Even if plaintiff’s action was barred by the statute of limitations contained in the Paternity Act, was the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Ramey v. Michigan Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. CurtisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Smith v. ThompsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API