Legal Opinion

McQuaid v. Baughman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 20, 1912No. Gen. No. 16,318Published

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the HoN. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice F. A. Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is urged on behalf of plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, that different instruments executed as evidence of one transaction at the same time or different times, must be .construed as a single instrument, and that where a contract is made upon an ample consideration and is afterward modified by separate instruments, the law constitutes it one contract, and the consideration of the original contract applies to and is sufficient for the modification.

These with other legal principles are urged by the plaintiff in error and are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bastian v. DreyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Schneider v. HeinsheimerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API