Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Heinsheimer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court, borough of Manhattan, tenth district, rendered in favor of the plaintiff upon a trial had before the court, without a jury. The opinion states the nature of the action and the material facts.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The written complaint substantially alleges that on or about February 5, 1898, the defendant, in consideration of the transfer to him by the plaintiff of certain shares of slock in the Schneider-Birkenstock Marble Company, and of all the plaintiff’s rights and interests in said corporation, promised and agreed to pay, among others, two certain claims, belonging to William Schneider and Charles Schneider, Jr., respectively, for $100 each against the said company, and the assignee thereof; that the said claims were then and there admitted by the parties litigant to be just and to be due and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McQuaid v. BaughmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API