Borino v. Lounsbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Writ op Mandamus requiring" the defendants, as registrars of voters, to restore the name of the plaintiff to the voting list of the town and city of Bridgeport, or to show cause to the contrary, returnable to and tried by the Superior Court in Fairfield County, Holcomb, J., upon a demurrer and motion to quash the alternative writ; the court sustained the demurrer and dismissed the writ, from which judgment the plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.
The application alleges that the relator, in 1905, was a resident and elector of the city of Bridgeport. ' In October of that year he was informed against by the prosecuting attorney of the City Court of Bridgeport, for obtaining money under false pretenses. Upon this information he was convicted, in the City Court of Bridgeport, and on appeal to the Criminal Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County he pleaded guilty to the offense charged against him in the information, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $30, which he paid. Thereafter, the clerk of the Superior Court in Fairfield County,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Schick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- MacKin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. GethersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Jacobs v. MajorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Walsh v. JenksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.