Legal Opinion

McDermott v. Halliburton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1929No. 8 Div. 103PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The appeal is from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver in a pending cause. ■ The original bill was filed by the heirs at law of a deceased mortgagor, seeking the exercise of the equity of redemption of a mortgage on a large tract of land in Marshall county.

The bill (the sufficiency of which was not questioned) charged usury and improper or insufficient credits, and sought an accounting of the amount due. The answer denied the material averments, and disclosed that a few days-after the bill was filed the mortgage was foreclosed under the power of sale; the mortgagee becoming the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fair v. CummingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Brown v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Pattillo v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Skidmore v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Warren & Co. v. PittsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Loop National Bank of Mobile v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Taylor v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Mead v. EagertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Adams v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Lost Creek Coal & Mineral Land Co. v. ScheuerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API