Legal Opinion

Mead v. Eagerton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 25, 1951No. 3 Div. 581PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This bill was filed by a taxpayer seeking an injunction, temporary and permanent, against appellees who are the chief examiner of public accounts, the state treasurer, the state comptroller and the state auditor. The prayer for the injunction is as follows: “Restraining and enjoining the respondents, Ralph P. Eagerton, as chief examiner of public accounts of the State of Alabama, John Brandon, as treasurer of the State of Alabama, John Graves, as comptroller of the State of Alabama, and Dan Thomas, as auditor of the State of Alabama, and each of them from using or attempting…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Jones v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State ex rel. Crumpton v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Aland v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. Druid City Hospital Bd. v. EppersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Southall v. Stricos CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Boaz Nursing Home, Inc. v. Recovery Inns of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API