Opinion No. (1998)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Representative Sullivan,
¶ 0 This office has received your letter requesting an Official Attorney General Opinion addressing, in effect, the following questions:
1. Is corporate farming constitutional under the OklahomaConstitution?
2. How should managed timberland be classified for assessment ofad valorem taxes?
3. Is the practice of not allowing a tax recipient (i.e., apublic institution such as a school, public library, EMS,vo-tech, city, county trash disposal, etc.) to protest anassessment before an equalization board or the Court of TaxReview, but allowing a taxpayer the opportunity to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Application of Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- LeForce v. BullardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969