Legal Opinion
Bechtel v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 9, 1972No. Cong. No. 3-69PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the Review PaNel:
This report is submitted for transmission to the Senate in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2509 and S. Res. 143, 91st Cong., 1st Sess. That resolution referred S. 1343, 91st Cong., 1st Sess., to the Chief Commissioner of the Court of Claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1492.
It was proposed in S. 1343 that the United ‘States “relinquish and disclaim any right, title, or interest which it may have in and to” certain lands which are now situated in Yuma County, Arizona, but which were formerly situated within *933the boundaries of tbe State of California before the Colorado River changed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Arkansas v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Johnston v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Corbetta Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- California Canners & Growers Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984