Legal Opinion

Stolzenbach v. Pagoria

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 4, 1979No. 78-809PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda

Defendant, Nick Pagoria, appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Allen Stolzenbach, the payee of a promissory note signed by defendant. On appeal defendant contends that: (1) the trial court’s finding that the note was supported by consideration was contrary to the pleadings and the proof; and (2) the note is unenforceable because defendant was coerced into signing it. We affirm.

Plaintiff confessed judgment on a promissory note signed by defendant individually and doing business as L. J. Wellenhofer Transfer Company (Wellenhofer). Plaintiff initiated confirmation proceedings…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lipkin v. KorenIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. First National Bank of Elgin v. AchilliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Gerber v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Riddle v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Hill v. ToddIllinois Supreme Court · 1862

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Congregation of the Passion, Holy Cross Province v. Touche Ross & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Boatmen's Bank of Benton v. DurhamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Burke v. BurkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Pedott v. DormanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Rybak v. DresslerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API