Legal Opinion

State v. Swarengin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1973PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

Defendant was convicted in the district court and, following trial de novo, in the circuit court of driving a motor vehicle with more than .15 percent alcohol in his blood in violation of ORS 483.999(1). ①

On appeal defendant contends that it was error for the circuit court to permit the arresting officer to testify concerning defendant’s performance on certain manual dexterity (“field sobriety”) tests at the scene of his arrest. Defendant reasons that while such evidence would be relevant in a driving-under-theinfluenee trial, it is irrelevant when the prosecution is for the separate offense…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. KohlaschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. KnollIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. State v. RollinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  3. Erickson v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  4. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API