Elrod v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Cherokee district court.
1Per curiam
As stated in the opinion rendered on the former appeal, there was no reference in the petition to any failure on the part of the company to light the depot platform. (Railroad Co. v. Elrod, 78 Kan. 868.) If negligence in that respect had been imperfectly or even inferentially charged, the court would have treated the petition as amended to conform to the proof and would not have reversed the first judgment. In all the cases relied upon by the appellee there was something in the pleading to amend by. Here there was nothing of that kind, and a new ground of liability could not be introduced and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ElrodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
3Cited by6 opinions
- Westover v. HooverNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
- Tiller v. St. Louis & S. F. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Oklahoma · 1911
- Hoffman v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Annis v. WarnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.