Owings v. Pool Well Service
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Dissent
ALMA WILSON,
Justice, dissenting:
The result reached by the majority fulfills the prediction expressed in my dissent in Parks v. Norman Municipal Hospital, 684 P.2d 548 (Okla.1984). The inevitable consequence of the Parks decision is the one reached by the majority in its opinion, that is, if the issue is one of evidence, the decision of the three judge panel will be rubber stamped by the appellate court if the panel uses the words “against the clear weight of the evidence” in the panel’s Order on Appeal. Even if a cursory examination of the record reveals that the clear weight of the evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Bittman v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- City of Chickasha v. LooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Alexander v. GeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.