Legal Opinion

Schrot v. Garnett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1963No. Calendar 34, Docket 49,820PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

To get his urgently supplicating client out of jail, the plaintiff attorney agreed with the client to pay certain of the latter’s child support arrearages in the sum of $250. The agreement was made on strength of the client’s promise to execute in favor of the attorney a mortgage of the client’s home premises in the sum of $350. The amount of the mortgage, per agreement, was to be made up of the payment plus a counsel fee of $100.

The attorney paid the arrearages as agreed. The client, however, having been released from custody, refused to execute the agreed form of mortgage upon tender…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Cheff v. HaanMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Van Camp v. Van Camp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Kachman v. SagoMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Steggall v. SteggallMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Warren Tool Co. v. StephensonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Senters v. Ottawa Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Rubel v. Brimacombe & Schlecte, P.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API