Legal Opinion

Poe v. Street Improvement District No. 340

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 25, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

The appellant, an owner and taxpayer of real estate in District No. 340 of the city of Little Bock, filed Ms complaint in the Pulaski Chancery Court against the district and its commissioners, the appellee, in which he set up, in substance, that District No. 340 was -duly established for the purpose of paving and improving Broadway Street in the city of Little Bock from Markham Street southward to the north line of Tenth Street; that thereafter a majority in value of the owners of real property abutting on Broadway Street petitioned the. city council of the city of Little Bock to annex the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Easley v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Farris v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. White v. LoughboroughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. White v. Arkansas & Missouri Highway DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gregory v. CockrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Lewellyn v. St. Imp. Dist. of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Pledger v. SoltzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Arkansas Valley Industries, Inc. v. LaneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API