Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arkansas Valley Industries, Inc. v. Laney

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 27, 1967No. 5-4147Published

1DissentJohn A Fogleman, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority in this case for the reason that proper construction of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1103 (i) (6) (B) exempts the activities of these employees from the application of the Act. What I contend is the proper construction of that Act is set out in mv dissenting opinion in Hanford Produce Company v. C. A. Clemmons, et al 242 Ark. 240, 412 S. W. 2d 828, handed down on this date. I agree with the majority that no exemption can be based upon Ark. Stat Ann. § 81-1103 (i) (6) (0), but for an entirely different reason. If the last sentence of that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Watkins v. Eureka SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  3. State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. Common School District No. 13 v. Oak Grove Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Crowly v. ThornbroughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API