Crossman v. Lesher

The charges of the plaintiff in his accusation filed herein are of the same nature as those referred to in Crossman v. Kenniston, ante, p. 379. By the accusation, the plaintiff herein sought, as in the Kenniston case, to remove the defendant from his office as city trustee. The matter was heard before another department of the superior court. Judgment was entered in favor of defendant for his costs, and plaintiff has appealed.

Counsel for appellant herein — counsel for respondent in Crossman v. Kenniston, ante, p. 379—rely upon a proposition not presented in the other proceeding. They claim…