Legal Opinion
Rose v. Superior Court of Imperial Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1927No. Docket No. 5426PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This proceeding is brought for the purpose of prohibiting the Superior Court from proceeding with the trial of an accusation against Mark Rose as one of the directors of the Imperial Irrigation District, and for his removal from such office as such director. The accusation in effect alleges that George Herrick Davis is a resident, qualified elector and voter and taxpayer within the district; that Mark Rose was elected a director of the district in February, 1921; that Mark Rose has not nor has any person been elected as his successor and that though an election was purported to have been held…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Atwood v. Cox, District JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- In Re MakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Estate of JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- People v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- County of Los Angeles v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.