Helix Milling Company v. Terminal Flour Mills Co. And General Foods Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BROWNING and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and LINDBERG, * District Judge. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Helix Milling Company (Helix) appeals the decision of the district court granting summary judgment and dismissing its claim for damages under § 1 of the Sherman Act [15 U.S.C. § 1] and § 7 of the Clayton Act [15 U.S.C. § 18]. We affirm the decision of the district court with respect to plaintiff’s § 7 claim but reverse and remand with respect to its § 1 cause of action.
Helix operated a mill in Oregon for flour and millfeed which was destroyed by fire. Plaintiff alleged that the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- John Lenore & Company, Model Distributing Company, John P. Lenore and Robert E. Livingston v. Olympia Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Morgan, Strand, Wheeler & Biggs v. Radiology, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Robinson v. MagovernDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Bubar v. Ampco Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.