Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heins v. Webster County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1996No. S-94-713Published

1DissentFahrnbruch, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion.

The majority opinion states that modern society does not contemplate such traditional classifications as invitee and licensee. However, the same majority opinion states that the majority of states have retained the common-law distinctions of invitee and licensee.

In Nebraska, we have had no problem in assigning liabilities based upon invitee and licensee status, as witnessed by the recent unanimous opinions McIntosh v. Omaha Public Schools, 249 Neb. 529, 544 N.W.2d 502 (1996), and Blackbird v. SDB Investments, 249 Neb. 13, 541 N.W.2d 25 (1995).

Th…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McIntosh Ex Rel. McIntosh v. Omaha Public SchoolsNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Acton v. WYMORE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 114Nebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Blackbird v. SDB INVESTMENTSNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. McCurry v. Young Men's Christian Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API