Legal Opinion

Koch v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 28, 1916No. 1590PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7763 (T. D. 35628).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This appeal presents the question of the appropriate dutiable classification of certain surgical instruments. Representative samples are before the court. The record discloses that they are uniformly referred to and described as follows: Exhibit 1, Auword’s cranioclast, an instrument used in some cases of stillbirth for crushing the head *535of the dead fetus to facilitate its extraction. This instrument is composed of heavy jaws between which is operated a tongue or lever', the contact jaws of which are serrated. Force is applied by a screw, operating alternately to bring each of the outer jaws…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Habicht, Braun & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Kotzin Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Stone & Downer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. United States v. Spiegel Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. Vitelli v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API