Leonillo Duran and Shirley Duran v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Leonillo and Shirley Duran were found deportable and subsequently sought reopening of their deportation hearing. Both claim they should have been notified during the hearing of their right to apply for relief from deportation during the hearing. The Immigration Judge found that neither petitioner had satisfied the requirements for reopening and the BIA affirmed. We affirm the Immigration Judge’s denial of Leonillo’s motion to reopen but vacate the denial of Shirley’s motion and remand.
FACTS
Leonillo and Shirley Duran, husband and wife, are citizens of the Philippines.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha WangSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Haitian Refugee Center v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Marie Lucie Jean, Lucien Louis, Cross-Appellants, State of Florida, Intervenor-Appellant v. Alan C. Nelson, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Arturo Ascencio Mendez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Andriasian v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Nestor Rodrigo Rios-Berrios v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Adela Hernandez-Ortiz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Sefadin Asani v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.