Legal Opinion

State v. Watkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 2002No. ED 80514PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.

The State appeals from the trial court’s order suppressing physical evidence seized from a defendant in conjunction with a traffic stop. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress because it found that the investigatory traffic stop had terminated prior to the trooper’s request to search. Finding there is insufficient evidence that the traffic stop had concluded, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

The following facts were developed at the hearing on the motion to suppress, which consisted solely of Trooper Burck-hardt’s testimony.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. RousanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. State v. MilliornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. State v. HylandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. EnglandMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. State v. MosbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. KempaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. StoebeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API