Hughes v. Hutt
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Chief Justice.
At issue on this appeal is whether, in an action to determine paternity and support obligations, an alleged father may raise as a valid defense or counterclaim an allegation that the mother deceived him into believing that she was practicing birth control when, in fact, she was not.
Appellee Orlanda Hughes gave birth to twins on August 1, 1978, and filed a complaint for support against appellant Carl K. Hutt on December 7,1978. 1 Appellant denied paternity and demanded a jury trial. He also filed a “counterclaim,” alleging that appellee had ceased…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Conway v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Stephen K. v. RONI L.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Pamela P. v. Frank S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- Linda D. v. Fritz C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Smith v. BeardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- C.A.M. v. R.A.W.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Faske v. BonannoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984