Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Hutt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1983No. 80-3-756PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Chief Justice.

At issue on this appeal is whether, in an action to determine paternity and support obligations, an alleged father may raise as a valid defense or counterclaim an allegation that the mother deceived him into believing that she was practicing birth control when, in fact, she was not.

Appellee Orlanda Hughes gave birth to twins on August 1, 1978, and filed a complaint for support against appellant Carl K. Hutt on December 7,1978. 1 Appellant denied paternity and demanded a jury trial. He also filed a “counterclaim,” alleging that appellee had ceased…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conway v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Stephen K. v. RONI L.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Pamela P. v. Frank S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Linda D. v. Fritz C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. Smith v. BeardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. C.A.M. v. R.A.W.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  4. Faske v. BonannoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API