Legal Opinion
Stayton v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1980No. 1-679-A-174PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.
Garnett Stayton and Roy Lee Meadows (Stayton and Meadows) were convicted of delivering a controlled substance, marijuana, in an amount in excess of thirty grams. Ind.Code 85-24.1-4.1-10. 1 They were also convicted of automobile banditry. Ind.Code 35-12-2-1 2 We affirm their conviction.
Facts favorable to the State show that Stayton and Meadows were arrested after an informant provided the Jeffersonville Police Department with information that they were seeking a buyer for one hundred pounds of marijuana. In response, the police initiated an undercover investigation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nicor, Inc. v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Zickefoose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Lisenko v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Bean v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Hardin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Romack v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Voirol v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Busam v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Townsend v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.