Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 1980No. 2-1076A393PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Judge.

Dave Williams was convicted of possession of heroin in an amount in excess of ten grams, IC 1971, 35-24.1-4-l(c) (Burns Code Ed.) (now repealed). We affirm. This cause was assigned to this writer in December, 1979.

I

Williams objected at trial to the State’s final argument. One alleged error is that the prosecutor asserted that Williams’ defense was “contrived.” Counsel *125objected for the reason that this argument attacked counsel’s integrity. Counsel did not ask for any specific relief by way of admonition, mistrial, or otherwise. We can reverse only if the defendant was placed in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Reid v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hardin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Lewandowski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Teague v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Trueblood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Benefiel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Seltzer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Brock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API