Legal Opinion

Alper v. Stillings

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1964No. 4662PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

Appellant commenced this action in the court below to terminate a lease from appellant to respondents’ assignor. Respondents counterclaimed for $6,000 damages for loss of business suffered “in the past three months” by reason of the harrassment of respondents and the patrons of respondents in the leased premises, and in addition, for $50,000 punitive damages by reason of appellant’s willful and malicious interference with respondents’ quiet and peaceable possession.

The subject of appellant’s complaint has become moot, as he sold the leased property pending…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. SchnitzerNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Knier v. AZORES CONSTRUCTION COMPANYNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Peterson v. WiesnerNevada Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Brown v. LindsayNevada Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Jefferson v. JoinerNevada Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mort Wallin of Lake Tahoe, Inc. v. Commercial Cabinet Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Kelly Broadcasting Co. v. Sovereign Broadcast, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Martsch v. NelsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Commercial Cabinet Co. v. Mort Wallin of Lake Tahoe, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Pahrump 194, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API