Legal Opinion

Mort Wallin of Lake Tahoe, Inc. v. Commercial Cabinet Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1989No. 19266PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from the district court’s Supplemental Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law rendered in response to our original order of remand. In that order, we affirmed the district court’s damage award to Commercial Cabinet but remanded for the district court to set out more clearly the basis for Wallin’s award. Commercial Cabinet Co. v. Wallin, 103 Nev. 238, 737 P.2d 515 (1987). From the record before us at that time, we could not effectively review the lump sum award to Wallin. Id. at 240, P.2d at 517.

Upon remand, the district court determined that $10,000.00 of Wallin’s…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Haner v. Quincy Farm Chemicals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bader v. CerriNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Brandon v. TravitskyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Wolfenbarger & McCulley, PASupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Central Bit Supply, Inc. v. Waldrop Drilling & Pump, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by27 opinions

  1. Frantz v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. ThitchenerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Southern Wine & Spirits v. Mountain Valley Spring Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Gibellini v. KlindtNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  5. American Heritage, Inc. v. Nevada Gold & Casino, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API