Grogan v. Ruckle
California Supreme Court
The points in this case, "which are given in the opinion of the court, came up on a re-argument of the case of Buckle v. Grogan & Lent, (cmie,p. 158.)
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Bennett, J.
On the re-argument, of this cause the objection was taken by the appellant, that this court cannot, after its judgment has been pronounced, direct a re-hearing.
Section 280 of the Practice Act provides that, “ after an ap- “ peal shall have been heard and determined, the judgment or “ order of the supreme court therein, and all things concerning “ the same, shall be remitted to the district court of the proper “ county, and thereupon such further proceedings shall be had “ in that court as may be necessary to carry such judgment or “ order into effect.”
Section 18 of the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Rowland v. KreyenhagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- Merchants' National Bank v. GrunthalSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Copper Queen Mining Co. v. Arizona Prince Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.