Legal Opinion
Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 11, 2016No. B245131PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.—
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant, Department of Fish and Wildlife (the department), and real party in interest, The Newhall Land and Farming Company (the developer), appeal from a judgment granting a mandate petition. The judgment, entered October 15, 2012, was granted in favor of plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity; Friends of the Santa Clara River; Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment; Wishtoyo Foundation/Ventura Coastkeeper; and California Native Plant Society. The litigation and appeal arise from the department’s December 3, 2010 certification of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Cal. Dep't of Fish & Wildlife, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Center for Biological Diversity v. California Department of Fish and WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- City of Modesto v. Dow Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- City of Modesto v. The Dow Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Sleep EZ v. MateoCalifornia Superior Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.