Legal Opinion
Daryl Ford Valenzuela v. Kraft, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 8, 1986No. 85-6348PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-appellant Kraft, Inc., appeals from the decision of the district court denying its motion for judgment on the pleadings. We affirm.
I
On March 3, 1983, plaintiff-appellee Daryl Valenzuela filed a complaint in California state court alleging sex discrimination by Kraft in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2. The state court action was filed within 90 days from Valenzuela’s receipt of a right to sue letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Kraft removed the action to the United States…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Willie Lee Miles v. K.W. Prunty, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re United Services Automobile Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- James F. Santa Maria v. Pacific BellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.