Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schilansky

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1961No. 2869PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Acting Judge.

This was a suit under a Medical Payments clause of an automobile insurance policy. Plaintiff claimed for medical expenses flowing from an injury sustained while operating the insured automobile with the permission of his brother, to whom the policy had been issued. The insurance company defended on the ground that certain exclusionary language in the policy barred recovery. The case was tried on stipulated facts and judgment was for plaintiff.

It was stipulated that plaintiff sustained, his injuries while operating the automobile with the consent of his brother, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Severson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Schweigert v. Beneficial Standard Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Loffler v. Boston Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Barbour v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. National Electrical Manufacturers Association v. Gulf Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. Potomac Electric Power Co. v. California Union InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
  3. Rubin v. Empire Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Washington Hospital Center Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  5. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Central Sur. & I. Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API