Legal Opinion
Barbour v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 3, 1958No. 2133PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Mary Benson had her car insured by ap-pellee. The policy provided the usual coverage for liability for bodily injury and property damage, and in addition contained an agreement to make certain medical payments. Applicable portions of the medical payments clause are printed in the margin. 1 Separate premiums were paid for each coverage.
Appellant’s daughter Mary was injured while riding as a passenger in Mrs. Benson’s car, which was being driven at the time by her son, Jerry Benson. Mary Barbour and appellant, as her next friend, brought suit against Mrs. Benson in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Severson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Distefano v. Delta Fire & Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Hawayek v. SimmonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
3Cited by7 opinions
- Truitt v. GainesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchilanskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
- Thomas v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Rogers v. Phoenix InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Rubin v. Empire Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.