Legal Opinion

IDT Corp. v. Clariti Carrier Services, Ltd.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, President Judge:

¶ 1 This appeal follows the trial court’s grant of preliminary objections and its dismissal of Appellant’s action based on the terms of a forum selection clause. We affirm.

¶2 Appellant, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New Jersey filed a complaint against Appellees, Clariti Telecommunications International, Ltd. (Clariti Telecom), a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business in Pennsylvania, and Clariti Carrier Service, Ltd. (Clariti CS), a United Kingdom corporation with a principal place of business in England. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. John Wyeth & Brother Limited v. Cigna International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Central Contracting Co. v. C. E. Youngdahl & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Crescent International, Inc. v. Avatar Communities, Inc. And Smede International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Churchill Corp. v. Third Century, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Morgan Trailer Mfg. Co. v. Hydraroll, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cid, H. v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Manchester Texas Financial Group, LLC v. ACE American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2021
  3. Savoia v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API