Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Salmen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1992No. C5-91-670PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes to us on the petition of the Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board for disciplinary action against respondent T. Jay Salmen, who was admitted to the practice of law in 1973. Having considered allegations of professional misconduct arising out of Salmen’s representation of a client who was also Salmen’s investment partner, the referee concluded that Salmen was guilty of unprofessional conduct justifying suspension.

Over a period of several years Salmen and John Bartz entered into a number of joint real estate investments. In 1985 Bartz withdrew from their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against ShaughnessySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KarlsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HougeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Duane A. KENNEDY, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 55128Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against CzarnikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API