Legal Opinion

The Borrowdale

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 16, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty. Libel for pilotage.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

This suit is brought by the libelant, T. F. Neil, against the ship Borrowdale, to recover a balance of $92.06, alleged to be due the libelant for pilotage. '

It is alleged in the libel that on May 30,1889. the libelant was a duly-licensed pilot for the Columbia river bar, and that on that day he took charge, as such pilot, of the Borrowdale, and brought her in over the bar to her anchorage at Astoria; that the Borrowdale then drew 20 feet of water, and her registered tonnage wras 1,197 tons; and that for said service the libelant is entitled to demand and receive the sum of $176, of which sum…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Motz v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. People Ex Rel. McConvill v. HillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Harland v. Territory, Washington Territory1887
  4. People ex rel. Jones v. PritchardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  5. City of Portland v. StockOregon Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Seattle Electric Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. State v. LawsonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Ebbert v. First Nat. Bank of CondonOregon Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API