Legal Opinion

Im Ex Trading Co. v. Raad

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 29, 1998No. 16820-4-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kurtz, A.C.J.

Under RCW 4.28.080(10), Washington courts may assert general personal jurisdiction over a nonresident corporation “doing business within this state.” Under some circumstances, RCW 4.16.180 tolls the applicable statute of limitations during the period a defendant is absent from the state. In 1990, Im Ex Trading Company, a Washington corporation, sold fruit to La Violetera, Ltd., a Brazilian corporation, through a broker located in Brazil. In 1995, Im Ex commenced an action against La Violetera and its president alleging that they had refused to pay the remaining $64,876 due in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Eulala Shute and Russel Shute v. Carnival Cruise LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Mbm Fisheries v. Bollinger MacHine Shop and ShipyardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. Crose v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftWashington Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raymond v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Raymond v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API