Im Ex Trading Co. v. Raad
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Kurtz, A.C.J.
Under RCW 4.28.080(10), Washington courts may assert general personal jurisdiction over a nonresident corporation “doing business within this state.” Under some circumstances, RCW 4.16.180 tolls the applicable statute of limitations during the period a defendant is absent from the state. In 1990, Im Ex Trading Company, a Washington corporation, sold fruit to La Violetera, Ltd., a Brazilian corporation, through a broker located in Brazil. In 1995, Im Ex commenced an action against La Violetera and its president alleging that they had refused to pay the remaining $64,876 due in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Eulala Shute and Russel Shute v. Carnival Cruise LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Mbm Fisheries v. Bollinger MacHine Shop and ShipyardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Crose v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftWashington Supreme Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Raymond v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Raymond v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001