Legal Opinion
McGee v. Southern Pacific Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 23, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUGARMAN, District Judge.
Mary McGee and Connell McGee, her husband, residents of New Jersey, bring action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Mary McGee and consequential damages sustained by her husband.
It is claimed that on February 1, 1955, Mary McGee was injured through the negligence of the defendant, The Southern Pacific Company, in Palo Alto,-California, while she was a passenger on its train.
The instant action was commenced on January 10, 1957.
The defendant now moves:
“1. For an order dismissing the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In the Matter of Emanuel JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
- Foster-Milburn Co. v. Knight, Chief JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- McComb v. Frank Scerbo & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- McCarley v. Foster-Milburn Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950
- McComb v. Frank Scerbo & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Southern New England Distributing Corp. v. Berkeley Finance Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1962
- Banana Distributors, Inc. v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Bunker v. ArmstrongDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
- Camp v. Lebanon Fabrics Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.