Interstate Power Co. v. Anaconda Copper Min. Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Sanders County; Asa L. Duncan, Judge. Consolidated Actions by the Interstate Power Company against the Anaconda Copper Mining Company and another. From judgments for plaintiff and orders denying them new trials, the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly
The following statement, which is in part quoted from appellants’ brief, will be sufficient to illustrate the contentions made herein in their behalf: ‘ ‘ The respondent, plaintiff below, filed in the district court seven actions, numbered 601, 602, *511603, 604, 605, 606 and 608, for the purpose of condemning certain parcels of land along the banks of Clark’s Fork of the Columbia River, in Sanders county, Montana, the said lands to be flooded because of the proposed construction of a dam or dams across the channel of said stream, ‘wherewith to confine and impound the waters of said river,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- White v. Chicago, M. & P. S. Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1914
- Copenhaver v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1911
- Yellowstone Park Railroad v. Bridger Coal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1906
- Helena Power Transmission Co. v. SprattMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- Helena & Livingston Smelting & Reduction Co. v. LynchMontana Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Alexander v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1963
- State Highway Commission v. ManryMontana Supreme Court · 1963
- Komposh v. PowersMontana Supreme Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.