Legal Opinion

State v. Stalnaker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 10, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

The defendant offered the testimony of a niece of the defendant that while deceased was lying on the ground in his back yard after being burned, she asked him, “George, what happened?” George looked up at her and said, “Leta didn’t do this.”

Upon objection by the State, the trial judge overruled the objection and allowed the testimony; but the trial judge ruled that George Stalnaker’s statement was not a dying declaration. The trial judge ruled that since the defense opened the door to hearsay evidence, the State could explore the whole area of hearsay evidence. The defendant assigns as error…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. . DebnamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Freeman v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SmallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API