A & B Irrigation District v. Idaho Conservation League
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
958 P.2d 568 (1997)
131 Idaho 411
In re: SRBA Case Nos. 39576, 91-00005 ex rel. General Provisions re: Basin-Wide Issue 5, Entered 4-26-96.
A & B IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Falls Irrigation District, and Burley Irrigation District; Fremont-Madison Irrigation District and Mitigation Group; Payette River Water Users Association, Inc.; State of Idaho, Appellants,
v.
IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, Idaho Rivers United and Idaho Wildlife Federation; Amalgamated Sugar Company, City of Ashton, City of Bliss, City of Buhl, City of Burley, City of Cascade, City of Chubbuck, City of Council, City of Declo, City of…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Johnson; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Silak; Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Srba Case No. 39576Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Snake River Basin Water SystemIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Musser v. HigginsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.