Legal Opinion

Whitlock v. . Alexander

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action by the receivers of the Carolina Ice Company, insolvent, to recover of defendant, as holder and owner of 62 1/2 shares of stock, $100 each, in said corporation, 31 1/4 shares being on original subscription, issued July, 1908, and 31 1/4 by reason of a stock dividend, issued 11 February, 1909, the claim being that nothing of value had been paid on either issue. The defendant having denied liability, issues were submitted and responded to by jury as follows:

1. Are the 31 1/4 shares of stock of the Carolina Ice Machine Company mentioned in the third paragraph of complaint, held by the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. HoagSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Fogg v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Coit v. Gold Amalgamating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. McIver v. Young Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roscower v. . BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Park Terrace, Inc. v. BurgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Atlas Trailers & Water Mufflers, Inc. v. McCallumTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Farnsworth v. Union Trust & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
  5. Quinn-Marshall Co. v. McDaniels Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API